Most of us know it is more politically correct to state that somebody has a substance abuse problem as opposed to tagging that person a”substance abuser.” However, does this really matter? Certainly the language used to refer to a individual seeking treatment for alcoholism or drug dependence does not matter to people charged with his or her care.
A study indicates. Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital found that altering the words used to describe somebody struggling with alcoholism might alter the attitudes of healthcare professionals – even people specializing in dependence.
These researchers randomly distributed polls to over 700 mental health professionals attending two 2008 conventions centered on mental health and dependency. The polls started with a sentence describing an imaginary individual,”Mr. Williams,” who’s having difficulty adhering to some court-ordered treatment plan requiring abstinence from alcohol and other medications. On half the polls, he’s known as a”substance abuser;” on others, he’s described as being”a substance use disorder,” with all the remainder of the story being precisely the same.
While the language used to explain”Mr. Williams” didn’t substantially alter the respondents’ hypothetical clinical guidelines, participants who obtained the paragraph describing him as a”substance abuser” were more inclined to blame him for falling off the wagon and agree he ought to be penalized for not following his necessary treatment program.
Most of us know words have electricity. In the actual world, let us make sure they do not increase the self-loathing and self-blame that often keeps a suffering person from seeking aid s/he needs. More at Court approved evaluation Lawrenceville